<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Mazda 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cardesignfetish.com/2008/11/21/2010-mazda-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cardesignfetish.com/2008/11/21/2010-mazda-3</link>
	<description>Design From the Mouths of Designers.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:15:37 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ramkey</title>
		<link>http://www.cardesignfetish.com/2008/11/21/2010-mazda-3/comment-page-1#comment-3514</link>
		<dc:creator>ramkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cardesignfetish.com/?p=2639#comment-3514</guid>
		<description>Mixed feelings for me on this one.  It seems that Mazda has been creating their brand identity with a little bit of muscle in their designs.  Their strong, muscular shoulders are being carried through to quite a few of their designs from their SUV&#039;s to the just released mid sized Mazda 6 sedan.  I welcomed this approach in their CX-7 and CX-9 design.  SUV&#039;s can get away with having a powerful stance and presence on the road.  I was ok with the Mazda 6 incorporating this feature.  Just check out the article &quot;zoom zoom zoom here comes the Mazda 6.&quot;

However, I am not too sure if it is appropriate for the Mazda 3.  It has lost some of that &quot;nimble&quot; and light feel to it. So in this respect, I agree with &quot;Digitals&quot; comments above.  This design cue seems to be a bit over used.

The front facia, though nicely detailed, appears a little too busy and a bit heavy. I prefer more of a cleaner look.  The side of the vehilce does a great job of creating some visual interests with surface tension at the bottom of the door panel.  You see this type of surfacing in the 3 series as the character line of the vehicle.

It would be good to see some interior pics to understand how they have progressed.

Ramkey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mixed feelings for me on this one.  It seems that Mazda has been creating their brand identity with a little bit of muscle in their designs.  Their strong, muscular shoulders are being carried through to quite a few of their designs from their SUV&#8217;s to the just released mid sized Mazda 6 sedan.  I welcomed this approach in their CX-7 and CX-9 design.  SUV&#8217;s can get away with having a powerful stance and presence on the road.  I was ok with the Mazda 6 incorporating this feature.  Just check out the article &#8220;zoom zoom zoom here comes the Mazda 6.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, I am not too sure if it is appropriate for the Mazda 3.  It has lost some of that &#8220;nimble&#8221; and light feel to it. So in this respect, I agree with &#8220;Digitals&#8221; comments above.  This design cue seems to be a bit over used.</p>
<p>The front facia, though nicely detailed, appears a little too busy and a bit heavy. I prefer more of a cleaner look.  The side of the vehilce does a great job of creating some visual interests with surface tension at the bottom of the door panel.  You see this type of surfacing in the 3 series as the character line of the vehicle.</p>
<p>It would be good to see some interior pics to understand how they have progressed.</p>
<p>Ramkey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital</title>
		<link>http://www.cardesignfetish.com/2008/11/21/2010-mazda-3/comment-page-1#comment-3513</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cardesignfetish.com/?p=2639#comment-3513</guid>
		<description>The overall design is a bit more zoom zoom then the rest of the vanilla out there.  I like the new direction.  I also like how Mazda is actually taking some of the inspiration from the show cars and integrating that into the production cars.  

1 thing I completely dislike.  

#1 is the really generic attempt to add more flair to the fenders.  It does not work that well on the RX-8, why carry it along the entire car brand.

Yes it is a bit of a differentiator.........but it is the laziest of all design elements, reminds me of the PT Cruiser, Chevy HHR, The Chevy HRE Dodge Power wagon, etc........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The overall design is a bit more zoom zoom then the rest of the vanilla out there.  I like the new direction.  I also like how Mazda is actually taking some of the inspiration from the show cars and integrating that into the production cars.  </p>
<p>1 thing I completely dislike.  </p>
<p>#1 is the really generic attempt to add more flair to the fenders.  It does not work that well on the RX-8, why carry it along the entire car brand.</p>
<p>Yes it is a bit of a differentiator&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;but it is the laziest of all design elements, reminds me of the PT Cruiser, Chevy HHR, The Chevy HRE Dodge Power wagon, etc&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

